I want you to help me steer [REPO] by its vision instead of me reviewing every issue.
Step 1 - Draft a VISION.md. Look at what the project already is (README, recent PRs, the issues people file) and write an explicit VISION.md that states where this project should GO - its purpose, who it is for, the kind of changes that belong, and the kind that do not. This is about direction, not a feature list. Show it to me and refine it with my edits until it is right, then save it as VISION.md in the repo.
Step 2 - Use it as the triage rubric. From now on, for every open issue and PR, judge it against VISION.md and label it: vision-aligned, off-vision, or needs-my-call. For vision-aligned items, propose a short plan and - once I approve the batch - start shipping them. For off-vision items, draft a kind closing comment explaining it does not fit the direction. Bring the "needs-my-call" ones to me as a short list.
Rule: VISION.md is the source of truth for what belongs. When you are unsure whether something is aligned, ask me - and if it is a real gap, propose an edit to VISION.md rather than guessing. Never close or merge anything without my go-ahead.